Monday, April 18, 2022

Planning for Operations on the 4th Subdivision: Trains and Towns

 


Eastbound "Mail Train" with a local freight in the siding at Willow Springs on the old layout 
My plans for the current model railroad include two scheduled passenger trains and several scheduled freight trains. Also, with my current plan, the logging railroad has trackage rights on the 4th Subdivision. 

One scheduled passenger train will be a "mail train" traveling between Port Gulick Bay staging and Chikamin with stops at stations between them and turning at Chikamin. It will be made up of the doodlebug and sixty foot RPO seen in the photo. The other scheduled passenger train will be a "milk train" that leaves from Ferndale Jct. staging, works the Carnation plant spur, returns empty milk cans along the way, and then turns at Chikamin to return. It will pick up full milk cans at stations, before working the Carnation plant and returning to Ferndale staging. 

At least one scheduled local freight will travel between Ferndale Jct. and Chikamin. Other expected daily freights will include the "Rock Train" with silica sand from east of Chikamin and limestone from the NP interchange and then returning with empties. A daily turn from Ferndale Jct. to Port Gulick and back may be scheduled. At some point, a weekly "stock train" may be added as an extra, and when needed an additional local may also be added as an extra. 

Benchmark footprint plan for the 4th Subdivision

Traveling from the west at sea level through farmland and forest to the east into the Cascade foothills, the 4th Subdivision travels through several towns with related industries. I will list them in order with prototype and modeling notes:

  • Port Gulick 
    • Look at Anacortes for industry details and ideas
    • Mayger Old Fish Station at Columbiariverimages has backdrop ideas
    • Passenger train and town industries into hidden staging to turn
    • Harbor and wharf industries as modelagenic features
  • Curtis 
    • Features a lumber mill
    • Look at Nooksack plans from Meadville layout
    • Good stretch of scenery between Port Gulick and Curtis
  • Ferndale Jct. 
    • Hidden run-through
    • Hidden fiddle tracks (see recent track plan)
    • Walk through utility area (furnace, well, filter, etc.)
    • Removable staging for work on utilities?
    • Carnation Company is visible (have photos and plans of prototype)
  • Nooksack
    • Use existing Willow Springs module
    • Extend passing track for seven car train?
    • Everson as prototype for cannery
    • Other industries? 
    • NP interchange and logging junction in scenic section?
  • Chikamin
    • Use existing module, but extend it a bit?
    • Redo all the track? (It is code 100 and Atlas switches)
    • Replace turntable? 
Schematic sketch of 4th Subdivision (boxes represent scenic breaks)



Thursday, April 7, 2022

Update on Designing the 4th Subdivision

 

Most recent version of the 4th Division


In planning for the larger railroad, intended to fill two thirds of the basement, I have been following some of the guidelines in Lance Mindheim's book, How to Design a Model Railroad, as I described in a post last November. In addition to the three plans mentioned in that post, I worked out three or four others (each of them had some problems) utilizing modules from my attic layout in Meadville before coming up with this final (?) version. 

In addition to using some of the previous modules or sections, I want to hit some operational and visual goals. While I expect to be just running by myself most of the time, I also want to be able to match at least the minimum requirements for the AP operations (Chief Dispatcher) certificate and be able to hold operations sessions with a few others in case I find myself leaning in either of those directions. I also know that for me to be happy with my model railroad, I will want it to appear realistic, like a miniature world, approaching the look of a three dimensional painting.    

Existing modules to incorporate

Keeping in mind that while this planning is for the entire railroad, I intend to follow Joe Fugate's TOMA (The One Module Approach) suggestion of building one or two sections to completion and operate with temporary staging before adding additional sections. The town of Nooksack on the benchwork footprint plan at the beginning of this post is one of the existing modules as is the trestle scene module that we moved from our former home. While I may want to lengthen the passing track, those modules should go back together well. Unless I make a huge shift in my thinking, making some minor adjustments to those two modules and getting them under way will be the beginning of the 4th Subdivision v.2.

In Mindheim's book, he suggests reviewing several considerations before moving from the footprint and route stage to overlaying the final schematic and track plan. Generally following from his prompt questions, here are some of my thoughts based on this final version.

  • While I might want some kind of continuous run possibility, this is essentially a point to point design. The staging/Ferndale area is not developed at this point, but my unplanned concept is for a combination of fiddle yard staging and a direct run through. If practicable I may add continuous running here with "the blob" as the other end, but if it doesn't work out, that is okay as it won't interfere with my operations plan. 
  • For the most part, this design contains easy access without lift-outs or duckunders, and it has fairly open aisle-ways. Ferndale staging is the main exception to this as it is hidden from the main layout, and the access to it requires walking around into the utility area. The dead end aisle with both Carnation Co. and Curtis has the potential to become crowded with multiple operators, and the entrance to it is below my desired four foot aisle-ways. It is more spacious than the rejected plans though.
  • The turn-back blob at a five foot width will allow for maintaining my curve radius minimum of 24." The reach-in distances are all quite manageable. Both of these were issues in previous design attempts. 
  • One area of concern is having suitable scenic or negative space between the more intensive secondary track elements. Particularly if I plan on somewhat longer train lengths, I want to avoid trains just running from one built up area directly into another with the locomotive in one and the caboose still in another. 
While I don't have all the areas and trackwork thoroughly planed here, I am confident that I can identify any minor changes in the Nooksack modules needed to move forward, start those changes, and begin some room prep.